Portuguese e-government

July 28, 2010

In The Great E-mancipator  I try not to restrict the view of e-government to the UK or America, and try to pick up relevant news from wherever in the world there are attempts to implement it.

In the Financial Times of July 13 2010* there appeared a story from Portugal where, whilst the Portuguese are apparently “addicted to technology”, they suffer the same paper-heavy bureaucracy that much of the world puts up with. There have been various attempts to resolve this, but it does show that there’s not much difference between Portugal and the rest, despite the love of technology!

It also shows, yet again, that technology is subsidiary to the changes in processes needed to give citizens improved services!

*You’ll have to register but it’s free!


The maturing Internet

July 25, 2010

A new report from UKOM, the UK Online Measurement Company – which is powered by Nielsen, announces people over 50 years of age were responsible for much of the growth in Internet usage over the last year. Unfortunately, there’s no mention of government website usage, but I imagine government, if it’s paying for tools to measure usage, is probably using ones other than those produced by Nielsen.

There’s no real surprises in the sites being visited either, with holidays and family history picking up the majority of visitors. The press release itself has comparative data by age and gender for Internet usage which is quite useful in itself, but elsewhere on the site is also a Powerpoint presentation of Internet usage trends dated May 2010. This covers regional use, the different categories by time of day, along with categories (again, no mention of government!)

Some of the data indicates quite a heavy usage of Facebook and social media with peak usage at 4:00 until 5:00 (they can’t all be schoolchildren can they?) It also shows the bias to London and social class ABC1. One main area demonstrated is that the main online tool is Google, which makes me wonder if we are in a constant search for information, without a target rationale?


Out of focus

July 22, 2010

As a method of determining policy or measuring anything I’ve always been nervous about the use of focus groups. My nervousness was rationalised when I read the review in New Statesman by former Labour MP and government minister Chris Mullin of a new book by Deborah Mattinson entitled “Talking to a Brick Wall: How New Labour Stopped Listening to the Voter and Why We Need a New Politics”.

Whilst neither the author of the book nor author of the review appear critical of New Labour alone for their reliance upon feedback from focus groups, I do wonder whether we can rely upon the simple mechanism of collating feedback, until the confidence of the citizens in public service is regained?

Having suffered the scandals of MP’s expenses, highly paid ‘public servants’ and others in the press continually, are we ready to accept public duty as a two-way operation? An operation where feedback means something and will be used to improve services by the recipients, because they’re not in it for their own gain.

Are focus groups just a pretence of consultation?


Gov 2.0 in Germany

July 20, 2010

I’ve mentioned Alexander Schellong here before, but he’s now jointly authored a paper with Philipp Girrger entitled “Government 2.0 in Beta Phase” on the topic of web 2.0 applications studied in Germany’s 50 largest cities and 16 federal states.

The key statement is probably in the first paragraph “eDemocracy remains nothing more than a rhetorical promise” and is further raised in a quotation from Albrect et al (2008) where they state “government fails to address why it is offering eParticipation, how it is utilizing citizen feedback and whether citizen can expect a response from government or politics”, which is the conundrum faced when governments claim to be being open.

The study of these cities and states sees citizens still largely recipients of information, not that this is a bad thing, as long as it is correct. However there are some attempts at matters like participatory budgeting (20% of cities) and apparently the City of Cologne has won numerous awards for  its efforts in that direction. However, they estimate that only 0.5% of the 14,000 municipalities have implemented Internet-based budgeting.

The document picks up on the limited use made for participation of the single non-emergency number (115) but below that is a spider diagram of various social media tools which really demonstrates little work other than in RSS!

The most advanced cities are Bonn in terms of usage and Freiburg for the number of offerings. Unfortunately, whilst 60% of cities and 31% of states allow complaints to be received, less than 10% provide any information on their handling.

As usual from Schellong a useful report which might be interestingly compared with other European countries, including the UK.


The opening of Australia

July 18, 2010

Conveniently in time for the election, the Australian government has launched its Declaration of Open Government. A number of the comments below the posting are far more cynical than my linking it with the election announcement, although many are clearly supportive. However, as one commentator notes, what is the point in labelling it as an initiative of the Gillard government (which has only existed a matter of weeks) if the intention is to make it open and participative?

The declaration is to be applauded, but what are the next steps in increasing public involvement in government? The move from representative to participatory democracy is not an easy one, or is this just a gesture towards participation, without any real change? Australia has a history of being pro-active in e-government terms, although this may not have been for democratic purposes, if Paul Henman is to be believed.

The election result and follow through may prove interesting.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.