Public service?

October 27, 2009

Hidden in the depths of the Warwick Business School’s web site is an interesting 59 page publication produced in the last month or two, entitled “It’s a culture thing“.  It’s a  joint production by the Institute of Customer Service and the Local Government Centre within Warwick Business School and contains ten short case studies around local authorities including Bradford,  Blackpool and Torfaen.

Some key statements include one on p.48 that “customer feedback should inform service planning and delivery as well as communications strategies.” Folowed closely by the fact that “public satisfaction can also be a driver for service planning.”

The report concludes (p.54) that:

“The customer and citizen focused council is therefore likely to be one that:

  • is driven by a thorough understanding of local needs and preferences
  • puts users and citizens at the heart of its thinking on service development and delivery
  • has a clear view of what it is able to deliver and communicates it well
  • is capable of embracing new techniques and ways of working
  • and finally, is open to change.”

The conclusions are thoughts gathered from the case studies and perhaps  some detailed reference is needed back to practices at the authorities into practice but the actual fact that they have put greater focus upon what their citizens think may be part of the key?


User-centred approaches to e-government

October 25, 2009

A new document out from the OECD “Rethinking e-Government Services: User-centred Approaches” (240 pages) demonstrates how long its taken to turn the e-government aircraft carrier around to facing the citizen! Along with the recently published Cabinet Office guidance on Channel Strategy it would appear a new world has dawned upon the apparatchiks.

Don’t worry, you don’t need to be a subscriber, just take out the 7-day trial subscription and you have access!

The first chapter is entitled “A Paradigm Shift Towards Citizen Centricity” and what is states is that the message from the OECD leaders was that “the focus in public service delivery should be on user needs, demands, and satisfaction – not on the tools and service delivery channels governments have been focusing on since the mid-1990′s.” If we want a date for when the aircraft carrier started turning, this pronouncement was apparently made to the OECD Network of Senior OECD E-Government Officials 6-7 March 2008. My detailed research wants to get to the why’s and wherefore’s of the initial route and then the change twelve years later, but for the moment I’m just celebrating the move!

The chapter also asks whether “a user-centric approach forces governments to rethink whether a transformational” perspective on public service development and delivery is still the right one.” Importantly for the UK we have had the shift from e-government to t-government and presumably this  statement leverages both towards the door?

The fourth chapter is entitled “Monitoring and Evaluation User Take-up” , which lists the UK as having a national measurement framework, which may be a white lie, since what the document ultimately states is that “traditional metrics such as counting website hits and page impressions are not sufficient and often provide a very narrow and simplistic view of user take-up. Monitoring and analysing patterns of use, traffic volumes, user likes and dislikes, user satisfaction and attitudes towards information and data use, seasonal variation, audience breakdown, e-mails and feedback, and the use of search terms are all important elements in understanding how users consume electronic services.”  Unfortunately (for me), it doesn’t pick out the most advantageous metric(s) nor suggest that channel management requires all channels to be similarly measured but the next chapter does state that “countries have moved towards rethinking not just their Internet-based service delivery, but their service delivery in general without regard to delivery channel – to meet the users with services on their terms.” unfortunately, no examples are provided of the latter.

Strangely, I missed any mention of Web 2.0 or Government 2.0. whilst Andrea and others feel it’s still a hot topic?


Beatcounters

October 22, 2009

I haven’t before reported upon discussions at the Local CIO Council and since we try and operate within Chatham House rules, I won’t often, but in this instance I don’t believe I’m breaking them!

On the 20th October 2009 the packed agenda for the day included a presentation on the Socitm benchmarking scheme and its status in the current climate of the Operational Efficiency Programme etc…

Since part of the impetus for this blog is metrics, I have a vested interest in anything that considers channel shift and channel service comparison, which the benchmarks can, so I’m interested!

Unsurprisingly, one of my colleagues, Glyn Evans, commented upon Birmingham’s employment of ‘business value’, an approach that was generally found acceptable given that much of the value of I.T. initiatives is sometimes lost in the tradition of ‘bean counting’, hence I’ve labelled the soft alternative ‘beat counting’!

My own researches have included side investigations into ‘public value’ and ‘social capital’ as possible metrics, which whilst of no assistance on their own, may be able to be employed as parallel accounting contibutions, given sufficient focus upon what the citizen wants and needs.

Any thoughts out there?


Digital conclusion

October 20, 2009

I found out quite by accident, on Tuesday 20th October 2009 at the Local CIO Council at the Cabinet Office,  that the long forecast PWC/Martha Lane-Fox report on Digital Inclusion had hit the same tables we were sat around on the day before, and after a bit of digging here it is on the Race Online 2012 web site.

A quick glance and no surprises, and I can’t same I’m impressed!


Minister for e-government?

October 18, 2009

At last we have an e-government Minister in the UK! It’s Angela Smith, not that one , who is for ID cards and against transparency, but this one -  who’s not sold on ID cards and is sitting on the transparency fence.

Interestingly, Angela has been nearly there before. She was under under-Minister for local e-Government at the DCLG with responsibilities for the expensive and much slated Directgov publicity campaign of which she said “The whole aim of the campaign was to encourage public awareness. It appears to have been successful.” It certainly did appear to be, with local government screaming how much better use they could have made of the money! She also obviously slept through the early years of e-government stating in 2006, according to the Guardian’s Michael Cross  , that a big barrier to e-government is people simply not knowing that the option is available - ”Until three weeks ago, I hadn’t realised the possibilities.”

Anyway as e-government Minister, along with other responsibilites, she’s now back in charge of Directgov.

She does appear to have been good over her expenses, so it can’t be a punishment!

She also has a tangential link with the Great E-mancipator being a graduate of Leicester Polytechnic, which under the title of De Montfort University is the academic home of the researcher.

Let’s see how long this one lasts?


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.