Good complaint handling

April 19, 2009

A report in the Register claims that the  Dept of Work and Pensions isn’t working but the noticeable point is the good practice that the DWP is referred to by the Ombudsman, which is the ‘Principles of Good Complaint Handling’ on the Ombudsmans own site.

Among the points in the principles are:

• Including complaint management as an integral part of service design.

• Focusing on the outcomes for the complainant and the public body.

• Dealing with complainants promptly and sensitively, bearing in mind their individual circumstances.

• Listening to complainants to understand the complaint and the outcome they are seeking.

• Responding flexibly, including co-ordinating responses with any other bodies involved in the same complaint, where appropriate.

• Publishing service standards for handling complaints.

• Providing honest, evidence-based explanations and giving reasons for decisions.

• Keeping full and accurate records.

• Ensuring that decisions are proportionate, appropriate and fair.

• Acting fairly towards staff complained about as well as towards complainants.

• Acknowledging mistakes and apologising where appropriate.

• Providing prompt, appropriate and proportionate remedies.

• Using all feedback and the lessons learnt from complaints to improve service design and delivery.

• Having systems in place to record, analyse and report on the learning from complaints.

• Regularly reviewing the lessons to be learnt from complaints.

• Where appropriate, telling the complainant about the lessons learnt and changes made to services, guidance or policy.

These Principles are not a checklist to be applied mechanically. Public bodies should use their judgment in applying them to produce reasonable, fair and proportionate results in all the circumstances of the case. The Ombudsman will adopt a similar approach when considering the standard of complaint handling by public bodies in her jurisdiction.


Get satisfaction

April 8, 2009

If you go to some companies on the web you will find a satisfaction monitor called “Get Satisfaction“, it describes itself this way: “Get Satisfaction is a community that helps people to get the most from the products they use, and where companies are encouraged to get real with their customers. ” Its a bit like Zendesk, a sort of SaaS (software as a service). There’s a review of this new style of software on ReadWriteWeb.

The other thing I discovered when dealing with one of the companies using this approach was the “Company-Customer Pact“, a little bit like the pledges the police are now using and some other approaches to agreeing a way forward.


The evidence base

April 5, 2009

I’ve mentioned Gerry McGovern before, followed his writing for ten years, and along with the thinking that pops up on MyCustomer.com he frequently calls us to Gemba. His latest epistle does no less and uses examples including Amazon and Walmart.

I highly recommend a read for those who want to see how successful web managers do it! It applies univerally, as well.


What is e-government for?

April 3, 2009

The more I think about, read about and consider electronic government the more I am confused.

I suspect the horns of the dilemma are the constant misfit between representative and participatory democracy. With one hand we have government encouraging electronic service delivery and with the other restraining electronic democracy, this is particularly noticeable at a local level.

My model encourages citizen engagement but if we are labelling them customers, its obvious we only want to do service business with them not completely engage around policy and democracy.

As a number of people have pointed out many of the services governments deliver could be done by or mediated by other bodies such as private third-parties or charities. There is a misconception that only government should do it as a trusted agent, but unfortunately if they don’t public involvement in decision making they won’t be trusted and anyone might as well deliver the services! It’s not possible to turn a one-way street into a two-way one whenever one party wants it, it just will not work.

Chadwick, A., May, C., (2003). “Interaction between States and Citizens in the Age of the Internet: “e-Government” in the United States, Briatin, and the European Union.” Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration and Institutions 16(2): 271-300.

Pratchett, L. (1999). “New Technologies and the Modernization of Local Government: An Analysis of Biases and Constraints.” Public Administration 77(4): 731-750.


Social s(t)igma

April 1, 2009

Social S(t)igma

New posting on MyCustomer.com on Social Sigma. I’ve commented because whilst I agree with it, I think that focusing on a single channel is not such a good idea.

It may be the design or process on that channel at fault…


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.