Inclusive transformation

August 28, 2008

 

At the end of July, EURIM (http://www.eurim.org.uk/what_is_eurim/notes_to_editors.php#short_definition) the independent, UK-based, all-party Parliament-Industry group launched the report on its investigation into transformational government. It had John Suffolk, the government CIO, and Sir David Varney, advisor to the Prime Minister on public service transformation  amongst its witnesses. The report is brief, only eight pages with lots of white space, so not a hard read and page seven contains its list of twelve (strong) recommendations, numbers one, two and four of which I particularly liked and present here:

“1. Parliamentarians, especially those serving on Select Committees, take an active role in the governance of Transformational Government policy. There is a need for pre- and post- legislative scrutiny in order to help counter the disengagement between policy and delivery, and to offset some of the disadvantages associated with the change of personnel, often including ministers, in the time between primary and secondary legislation.

2. Select Committees actively use the powers they have to co-operate across departmental boundaries and to ensure that the biggest risks to this project are monitored, and are managed, so as to identify and praise good practice, ensuring that transformation leads to better services, not just cost-savings within silos.

4. Service providers also collectively agree and publish clear professional guidance on best practice performance management and measurement of success to better align resources and close the ‘policy to execution’ divide , including the importance of appropriate base-lines and benchmarks for target setting and performance monitoring;”

I look forward to the implementation of them all!

 
 

 


Computer Weekly blog awards

August 27, 2008

Despite being shortlisted, the blog didn’t make the top two in the Computer Weekly Blog Awards for 2008, but never mind! Interestingly the winners were both from education with the Microsoft Schools News taking the ‘gold’.

In the meantime I’ll keep up my campaign around metrics in local government service delivery, particularly electronic service delivery and with three dates for presentations already provisionally on the books:

Ethicomp 2008 - University of Mantua, Italy (not me though!)

ESD-Toolkit - Customer Satisfaction work group

EiP Conference - a little session on service delivery sophistry

This should all help develop phase 2 of the research! so please keep comments dropping in!


Which community?

August 22, 2008

Whenever I hear talk about communities I struggle. If asked which community I am in, I have to ask in which sense! The word ‘neighbourhood’ may have some class conotations (semiotic?) but fails to have the semantic ties that are easily construed with ‘community’.

Some examples:

Community of place – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_of_place

 

 

Community of practice – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communities_of_Practice

 

 

Community of position – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communities_of_Position

 

 

Community of action – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communities_of_Action

 

 

Community of interest – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communities_of_Interest

 

 

Community of process – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communities_of_Purpose

 

 

Community of circumstance – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communities_of_Circumstance

 

 

Community of inquiry – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_of_inquiry

 

 So which communities are you a member of and in which neighbourhood do you live?

 

 

Citizen oriented architecture

August 22, 2008

Having proposed a ‘citizen oriented architecture’ there is a need to decide who develops and manages what it is essentially described in my model. With its combinations of citizen service, web content management, voice and data communications all supported by by ICT, all have a claim upon it and all argue for their own professions currently.

With the fad for Web 2.0 there is a tendency to get absorbed in the technology but it is only the tool, use it with care and don’t exclude the many citizens who are unable to fully utilise it! The latest Socitm publication ‘Planning for ICT (version 2)‘ is another failure to appreciate this, being essentially an information and technology architecture looking out towards the citizen rather than the other way! The citizen sees channels but will see them converging upon whichever particular service or services they need at the time!

Thinking in terms of accessibility and digital inclusion, which service providers need to when dealing with citizens unlike customers, the process needs to be technology neutral and independent.

Whilst ICT supports the ‘citizen oriented architecture’, there is a need need for a new management model that is citizen focused and again technology neutral and independent!


Semantics, semiotics and sophistry

August 22, 2008

The debate about what is customer insight, need, focus etc; whether it should be citizen or customer, is an important one, not due to semantics but to semiotics (what we intend to mean by the use of particular words or expressions) and I believe there is an element of sophistry in their usage.

Calling someone a customer might be intended to give them a warm cuddly feeling whilst all the time they are a citizen in need of assistance. At least calling them a citizen means that as a part of a community they can expect certain privileges and the person assisting them has certain duties in providing the service, and the warm cuddly feeling can pervade all around when the citizen is satisfied.

Some definitions:

Customer – From Wikipedia – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Customer

A customer is someone who makes use of or receives the products or services of an individual or organization. The word historically derives from “custom,” meaning “habit”; a customer was someone who frequented a particular shop, who made it a habit to purchase goods there, and with whom the shopkeeper had to maintain a relationship to keep his or her “custom,” meaning expected purchases in the future.

Customer needs may be defined as the goods or services a customer requires to achieve specific goals. Different needs are of varying importance to the customer. Customer expectations are influenced by cultural values, advertising, marketing, and other communications, both with the supplier and with other sources.

Both customer needs and expectations may be determined through interviews, surveys, conversations, data mining or other methods of collecting information. Customers at times do not have a clear understanding of their needs. Assisting in determining needs can be a valuable service to the customer. In the process, expectations may be set or adjusted to correspond to known product capabilities or service.

Citizen – from Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizen

Citizenship is membership in a society, community, (originally that of a city or town but now usually for a country) and carries with it rights to political participation; a person having such membership is a citizen. Citizenship status often implies some responsibilities and duties under social contract theory. It is largely coterminous with nationality,[citation needed] although it is possible to have a nationality without being a citizen (i.e., be legally subject to a state and entitled to its protection without having rights of political participation in it).

We then get onto where semiotics meets sophistry:

Customer Insight -

This definition is taken from the Government Communication Network’s Engage Programme.  The Insight section on the Engage web site (http://engage.comms.gov.uk/ – only accessible to the Civil Service!) includes more detail on methodology and tools, together with some examples of where deep psychological truths derived from customer insight activity have been applied effectively in campaigns to drive behavioural change.

“ A deep ‘truth’ about the customer based on their behaviour, experiences, beliefs, needs or desires, that is relevant to the task or issue and ‘rings bells’ with target people.”

http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/public_service_reform/delivery_council/workplan.aspx

Customer Need – what the paricular needs of a definite class of customer are, these may be further defined in the ‘Circle of Need’ proposed by NWEGG/Apera.

“For a local authority this means understanding and delivering to customer need, measuring the extent to which it is being met (or unmet) and the extent to which it is changing. Understanding,like management, requires the individual to construct a mental model which provides a structure for more detailed information. The ability to develop, adapt and communicate the model is a key enabler to developing shared understanding. As such, the first step in addressing customer need is to model need from the customer perspective. The second is to pilot the model and use it operationally, by integrating it into ongoing citizen information collection processes and service design processes, so that it is
adapted with actual changes in need and changes in types of service delivery. The third step is to use the model to support need analysis and service planning processes.”

http://www.nwegg.org.uk/view_news.php?id=64

Customer Satisfaction – Customer satisfaction, a business term, is a measure of how products and services supplied by a company meet or surpass customer expectation. It is seen as a key performance indicator within business and is part of the four perspectives of a Balanced Scorecard. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Customer_satisfaction

Customer Engagement (CE) refers to the engagement of customers with one another, with a company or a brand. The initiative for engagement can be either consumer- or company-led and the medium of engagement can be on or offline. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Customer_engagement

Customer Profile – Segmentation breaks the market into sub-groups of consumers with similar demographic characteristics, lifestyles, product preferences and media preferences – this is the customer profile.

In my simple view the definitions would encourage us to stick with citizen for those government deals with, they hardly consume government, nor does government sell its services (often).

As a result I believe we need to develop a ‘citizen oriented architecture’ for which phrase I acknowledge the relationship with the phase of another blogger ‘customer oriented architecture’.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.