<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Theory of Parsimonius E-Government Service Management</title>
	<atom:link href="http://greatemancipator.com/2008/04/08/a-theory-of-parsimonius-e-government-service-management/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://greatemancipator.com/2008/04/08/a-theory-of-parsimonius-e-government-service-management/</link>
	<description>A discussion point on electronic government performance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 18:34:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Thomson</title>
		<link>http://greatemancipator.com/2008/04/08/a-theory-of-parsimonius-e-government-service-management/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pete Thomson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greatemancipator.wordpress.com/?p=46#comment-34</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is &quot;satisfied&quot;, a satisfactory service, the limit of our ambition? Of course it may be a challenge even to get to that, but it seems to me you would ideally want to get beyond it, to something like excellent or &quot;delighted&quot;.

I have (once!) been asked to rate my satisfaction with a service from 1 (bad) to 10 (good), and then asked &quot;if we didn&#039;t score 10, what would it take to get us there?&quot;. That maybe sends a more positive message than &quot;if you&#039;re just about satisfied, that&#039;s good enough for us&quot;. It might also throw up some new ideas for improvement.

And about steering the public to cheaper channels - surely you need an element of that? Improvements don&#039;t usually come for free, and budgets are finite, so if you don&#039;t realise some savings, sooner or later you have to settle for something less than excellence.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is &#8220;satisfied&#8221;, a satisfactory service, the limit of our ambition? Of course it may be a challenge even to get to that, but it seems to me you would ideally want to get beyond it, to something like excellent or &#8220;delighted&#8221;.</p>
<p>I have (once!) been asked to rate my satisfaction with a service from 1 (bad) to 10 (good), and then asked &#8220;if we didn&#8217;t score 10, what would it take to get us there?&#8221;. That maybe sends a more positive message than &#8220;if you&#8217;re just about satisfied, that&#8217;s good enough for us&#8221;. It might also throw up some new ideas for improvement.</p>
<p>And about steering the public to cheaper channels &#8211; surely you need an element of that? Improvements don&#8217;t usually come for free, and budgets are finite, so if you don&#8217;t realise some savings, sooner or later you have to settle for something less than excellence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

