Irish lessons

January 23, 2008

In a Special Report from the Comptroller and Auditor General of Ireland published in January 2008, about their eGovernment projects, the first two stated requirements are:

  • a current baseline
  • target business benefits in measurable terms

A little vague maybe but it’s a start!


Satisfaction is high on the agenda!

January 21, 2008

Not only are there documents from the Cabinet Office about ‘customer satisfaction’ but these seem to coincide nicely with ones being produced by the Local Government Association (LGA) and the National Consumer Council (NCC).

These can be found in the LGA’s document store.

The Improvement & Development Agency (IDeA) and Local Government Association have also commisioned a review of approaches to satisfaction, which is an interesting addition to the literature about fairly complex methods.

This all ties in with an article by David James in the New Statesman supplement of 21 January 2008 on Innovation and Change, entitled ‘Listening to the Customer’, where he states:

‘Nobody knows customer needs better thanthe customers themselves and by aggregating their views, customer-centric innovation emerges.’

This is reinforced in the same supplement by Simon Parker of Demos stating in an article about local government that:

‘The cutting edge is all about using the experiences and insights of the public as a spur to redesign services.’

None of which, in my opinion, will come from performance indicators but rather from proper channel managment based upon customer feedback (good and bad)!


Satisfaction – Canadian style!

January 13, 2008

 Discovering two British Cabinet Office documents by chance when all the furore about National Indicator 14 (avoidable contact) was going on, I started to wonder why we weren’t paying further homage to activities in recent years in Canada. The structure over there is slightly different with federal and provincial governments but the Canadians have been at the forefront of e-government, from a customer perspective, for years.

So whilst we have two new documents:

How to measure customer satisfaction: A toolkit for improving the customer experience in public services

Promoting Customer Satisfaction: Guidance on improving the customer experience in Public Services

The Canadians produced:

Client Satisfaction Surveying: Common Measurements Tool

Client Satisfaction Surveying: A Managers Guide

In the late 1990′s and the Institute for Citizen-Centred Service (ICCS), which has taken over the Citizen-Centred Service Network from the Canadian Centre for Management Development  has a library of publications for download or purchase.  All the documents mentioned above are probably best sourced by ‘googling’ for them but in the case of the Canadian ones it is perhaps due to their age, the ICCS having a number of other documents available.

I must admit that Cabinet Office guidance does refer critically  to the Canadian CMT and states that Suffolk Customer Service Direct is using it, however in the model I am suggesting, granularity is kept to a minimum and equates to the CMT Outcome, since I am looking for a straightforward view across all channels. 

C’est la vie?


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.